Join Our Community!
Share
User Profile
Q: Potential
asked by: Lilly Ivy on April 18th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
I'm not very good at debating. I am pro-choice and have had quite a few interesting conversations with a friend that is pro-life. She brings up the 'potential' of the child becoming president or someone important. I know most pro-lifers would agree with her, but there is also another side to that. They would have a much higher chance of being a dead beat, breeding another unwanted child, spreading disease, etc. Especially if they are left in a orphanage and told they are never wanted by anyone. Not saying 100%, but in my opinion, it's more likely they WILL NOT contribute to society and become president.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(8)
Avatar
oopoopoop
replied on April 18th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
Well, something like 1% of the entire US population is in prison (just google "US prison population" if you want details). What percentage then have criminal records? What percentage have a drug addiction? Let's compare that to how many presidents there are, or even research scientists, teachers, nurses, doctors and heck, garbage collectors because they are contributing to society too. Similarly, an economist has actually theorised that legalised abortion is responsible for about half the reduction in the crime rate since 1985: http://chronicle.uchicago.edu/990812/abort ion.shtml.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
meblonde01
replied on April 18th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
I'm thinking of a few presidents that should have been in prison. And probaly more of them did things we will never know of..
I'm Pro-life. But I don't think a child should not be aborted because they "might" become president. I look at it as a fetus developing into a human being.. and should have a chace like I did.. Not what they Might grow up to be.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
jujujellybean
replied on April 18th, 2008
Experienced User
Re: Potential
Lilly Ivy wrote:
I'm not very good at debating. I am pro-choice and have had quite a few interesting conversations with a friend that is pro-life. She brings up the 'potential' of the child becoming president or someone important. I know most pro-lifers would agree with her, but there is also another side to that. They would have a much higher chance of being a dead beat, breeding another unwanted child, spreading disease, etc. Especially if they are left in a orphanage and told they are never wanted by anyone. Not saying 100%, but in my opinion, it's more likely they WILL NOT contribute to society and become president.


I hate this pro life argument. It's so dumb. that isn't the point at all! who cares what it grows up to be?!?!?!?!?! It is a human like me and you and deserves the same rights. end of story.
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Jude-Love
replied on April 18th, 2008
Active User, very eHealthy
melblonde01 wrote:
I'm thinking of a few presidents that should have been in prison.


lmao...omg. so funny

Anyway, a fetus has teh potential to become anything. Good or bad. I think the real fact we have to look at is what is the potential for the child to have a good, normal life?
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Birch
replied on April 19th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
I don't care for the potential argument either, but to throw it back, what is the potential of the woman who is facing an unwanted pregnancy?
Did you find this post useful?
|
User Profile
Jude-Love
replied on April 19th, 2008
Active User, very eHealthy
I can't remember if I said this somewhere else or if it was, for some reason, deleted but when it comes to potential that is really not a valid argument against abortion. Fourteen year olds have the potential to legally buy alcohol. Should we just start letting them now anyway?
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
oopoopoop
replied on April 19th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
Jude-Love wrote:
I can't remember if I said this somewhere else or if it was, for some reason, deleted but when it comes to potential that is really not a valid argument against abortion. Fourteen year olds have the potential to legally buy alcohol. Should we just start letting them now anyway?


I agree. Otherwise we should also insist that every woman is perpetually pregnant -- pop one out and then start on the next. Because every sperm is sacred, and every potential human has to be given its chance.

No, "potential" works pretty well as an argument in favour of abortion (see my earlier post), but not against.

Also, it is wrong to even say there would be X number more human out there (and yeah, like there is such a shortage anyway), since so many of those who have abortions go on to have other children, many of which would not have been born if the aborted one had. Completely spurious argument.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
Tylanas
replied on April 21st, 2008
Especially eHealthy
That's why I don't judge off of potential. I judge off of capabilities; and when the fetus is capable of life, it has a RIGHT to that life.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Quick Reply
Search