Join Our Community!
Share
Debate Forums > Abortion Debate Forum > Comment: Contraception bill in state House
User Profile
Q: Comment: Contraception bill in state House
asked by: Birch on May 16th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
Ohio has a new bill the in House. Please send in comments:

http://frontier.cincinnati.com/blogs/forum /2008/05/contraception-bill-in-state-house .asp

Quote:
Ohio state Rep. Dan Stewart, D-Columbus, has re-introduced a bill to guarantee that sexual assault survivors are offered emergency contraception in hospital emergency rooms. The abortion rights group NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio praised the bill Thursday. Here's what NARAL said about the Compassionate Assistance for Rape Emergencies (CARE) Act in a press release:

“This commonsense legislation affirms that members of the Ohio House hear voters’ call for policies that empower women and protect their privacy, instead of the divisive attacks that defined previous Congresses,” (NARAL Executive Director Kellie) Copeland said. “State Representative Dan Stewart and his colleagues who have co-sponsored this legislation have once again demonstrated their steadfast leadership by authoring this thoughtful legislation.”

The CARE Act would ensure that survivors of sexual assault are offered emergency contraception (EC) in the emergency room. Each year, approximately 25,000 women in the United States become pregnant as a result of rape. Many of these pregnancies could be prevented if sexual assault victims had timely access to EC. Polls show that nearly 80 percent of American women want hospitals – religious-affiliated or not – to offer EC to rape survivors.

Emergency contraception is a concentrated dose of ordinary birth-control pills that can dramatically reduce a woman’s chance of becoming pregnant if taken soon after sex. EC does not cause abortion; rather it is a safe and effective way to prevent pregnancy and was recently approved for over-the-counter sales for adults.

NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation conducted two surveys to examine the availability of EC in hospital emergency rooms across the state. The first survey in 2004 showed that nearly 60% of all Ohio hospitals did not guarantee access to EC for sexual assault survivors, almost 25% said they never give it out. In 2007 the picture had improved slightly with nearly 20% of hospitals who responded to the survey not guaranteeing access for sexual assault survivors (only half of Ohio hospitals participated in the second survey). Unfortunately these studies also showed that there is a lack of knowledge about this medication among emergency room staff, with both reports finding instances of ER staff confusing EC with the abortion inducing medication Mifepristone (or RU-486). Our research confirms that legislation is necessary to protect access to critical reproductive health care for sexual assault survivors in our state. You can view these studies at http://www.prochoiceohio.org/.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Replies(8)
User Profile
Darkmoon
replied on May 16th, 2008
Active User, very eHealthy
I hope it passes. Women's health should come before people's opinions.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
amino65
replied on May 16th, 2008
Experienced User
I'm suprised some hospital staff didn't know the difference between EC and RU-486.

It would be great if the bill was passed to offer EC to sexual assault victims in the ER, I can't see why they shouldn't. If it is offered, women have the option of saying yes or no based on their beliefs, and hospital staff would have much less of a say based on their own beliefs, which shouldn't even be an issue in such a setting in the first place. It is a relief to know there are still some people out there who are still fighting for a women's rights. Wink
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
aochriss
replied on May 16th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
The reason people confuse EC and RU 486 is because of propaganda spread by pro-life groups. They are anti-birth control but they know that their message is unpopular so they disguise it with the anti-abortion message.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Users who thank aochriss for this post: Darkmoon 
Avatar
anniek
replied on May 19th, 2008
Experienced User
I am Pro life and think the bill would be wonderful. Like you said it would be up to the women. And EC is not gettin rid of an egg and sperm joined together. It is preventing this from happening.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Users who thank anniek for this post: aochriss 
Avatar
aochriss
replied on May 19th, 2008
Extremely eHealthy
Annie, here is a web site with extremely valuable information:

http://www.aaplog.org/decook.htm

It is a pro-life website: American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists

It goes into detail of why different forms of bc are NOT causing abortions.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
anniek
replied on May 20th, 2008
Experienced User
Thank you for the site. I hope many go and look at it. As I said in another thread I work in a pharmacy and for a bc to cause an abortion you would have to take a very large amount at one time. I tood bc for a month not knowing I was pregnant and part of the next month on and off still not knowing (I only took some because it was making me sick when I took it, low and behold it was morning sickness!). My son is a very healthy lil boy and always has been.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Users who thank anniek for this post: aochriss 
User Profile
Darkmoon
replied on May 20th, 2008
Active User, very eHealthy
We need more pharmacists like you, anniek. I wish you could magically share your sense of fairness and reasoning with other prolife pharmacists.
Did you find this post useful?
|
Avatar
anniek
replied on May 20th, 2008
Experienced User
Thank you very much! Smile Just a note I'm not a pharmacist I'm a Certified Tech. But just so you know my pharmacist both believe as I do. They are pro-life but understand how bc and Morning after pills work. I just hope more people can understand!
Did you find this post useful?
|
Quick Reply
Search