This site sent me emails informing me that each of my posts contained advertising, and two of my posts were censored. I can assure you, I'm just trying to present information about a food I consider very healthy, but which is often erroneously thought to bad for you because it contains cholesterol. No study has ever shown egg consumption to increase chances of heart disease. It's too bad that belief still persists among the general public, because eggs raise blood cholesterol a rather minimal amount and the nutrients they contain are good for the heart and circulatory system. The Harvard Medical Center online will tell you that an egg a day can be part of a healthy diet.
Anyway, back to my censored posts. The first edit removed a link to a commercial site, but the page was mostly devoted to a comparison of duck and chicken egg nutrients. It's the most comprehensive I have seen. If you want to find it, google the following words and it will likely be the first hit: Duck Chicken Egg Nutrient Comparison. And seriously, if you want to buy duck eggs, get them from wherever you want.
The second was a reference to the information comparing pastured and store-bought eggs. My link was just an article on the Mother Earth News site. I double-checked the page. They weren't selling anything in the article. They probably want you to subscribe to their magazine, but you don't have to do that to read the information on the page. And yes, there were ads on the page, but what site doesn't have ads on the page? This site does--there are five to the left of my posts right now. It's brief, but you can search for it if you want. It was "Free Range vs. Pastured: Chicken and Eggs," dated 3/5/2009. Or just read the blog post you get when you google these keywords: egg pastured conventional