I want you to understand something.
Foreskin feels REALLY good. It's HIS body, and morally HIS decision.
95% of the non-Muslim world does not circumcise. The Catholic church officially forbids it. The New Testament makes plain in like dozens of places (e.g. Romans 2:29, Romans 3:30, Acts 15:10, I Corinthians 7:18, Galatians 5:6, Galatians 5:2, Galatians 6:15, Philippians 3:2, Colossians 2:12, Matthew 9:12) that circumcision is NOT part of Christianity.
Since no national medical association on earth endorses routine circumcision, it is cosmetic surgery. Just because you live in the last country that still cuts a majority (57% and falling) of infants for non-religious reasons, doesn't mean you have to do this horrid thing to him. In California and Western states, over 3/4 of infants are left intact today.
Every place they used to circumcise where they have largely stopped (e.g. Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand) they have had NO outbreak of penis problems. So many places NEVER got caught up in this (Germany, Finland, Sweden, Italy, Brazil, China, Russia, Argentina, Japan) and they're doing fine as well.
In Finland and Sweden with almost no circumcision, they have lower rates of penile cancer than we have in the US. Most of the US men who have died of AIDS were circumcised at birth. Circumcision does not prevent AIDS. There is now a vaccine for HPV in case somebody had convinced you that every intact male is some kind of carrier.
Your child has a basic human right to enjoy the body nature evolved for him. Every mammal on earth evolved a foreskin before there was surgery, or soap, or even running water. The natural penis is as self-cleaning as the vagina. If someone wants to be cleaner than is natural, that's when you break out the soap. (Although until the child can retract his OWN foreskin, there is absolutely no reason for it to be retracted according to the AAP).
Surgery in infancy is THE WORST time. The foreskin is still fused to the glans like fingernails to a nail bed. Tearing it away often causes pits and gouges to the glans. (Google Circumcision damage to see the gory details). Everything is so tiny, any small error is magnified as the child grows. The doctor has no idea how the child will grow or how much slack skin he will need or want. He also has no idea how stretched out his skin is at the time of the surgery (there may be shrinkage due to a cold operating theater, or there could be erection due to the handling of the organ, the doctor doesn't know the whole range of states of that person's anatomy). Healing in diapers leads to infections and ugly skin bridges regardless of the surgeon's skill, and the child can't communicate if something doesn't feel just right about the healing process. Plus of course he can't tolerate a proper level of pain relief for the procedure or for healing like an older person can.
But there's no reason to think he'll need cut later. Only a third of a percent of men who make it to adulthood intact choose to get circumcised for any reason.
How many men who are disgusted with the fact that an awesome pleasure receptive part of their body was stolen are you willing to dismiss? A guy who says "I'm cut and sex is just fine" is no authority. That's like asking a man with one ear if stereo is better than mono. I know it must seem impossible, but the foreskin is the BEST part of the penis, with over half the sensual nerve endings. Without the foreskin, the glans gets numbed, and the exquisite natural frictionless rolling/gliding mode of stimulation is lost. There is no right time to violate someone's human rights.
Leave him perfect, leave him intact.
-Ron and Alice Low
Proprietors
TLC Tugger.com, Inc.